DWP’s £452m Compensation Scheme Criticised By Lawyers Over ‘Scandalous’ Issues

DWP’s £452m Compensation Scheme Criticised By Lawyers Over ‘Scandalous’ Issues

Lawyers are raising alarms over scandalous issues as the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) disburses a staggering £452 million in compensation to affected benefit claimants.

The payout covers individuals who lost the Severe Disability Premium (SDP) and related enhancements when moving to Universal Credit before transitional protections began.

Affected individuals may receive up to £5,000+ per person, but concerns remain about how these sums were calculated.

Background: Why Compensation Was Needed

  • Legacy Benefits Transition: Claimants previously receiving Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) lost the Severe Disability Premium (SDP) when shifted to Universal Credit.
  • High Court Rulings: Between 2018 and 2019, two High Court decisions found the DWP failed to protect claimants’ incomes during this transition.
  • Compensation Scheme Launch: In response, the DWP launched a scheme earlier in 2025 to compensate those affected.

What Lawyers Are Saying

Law firm Leigh Day, led by Ryan Bradshaw, is demanding full transparency in how the compensation is calculated.

Bradshaw describes some cases as “scandalous,” especially those where claimants were warned that receiving compensation could push them into balance thresholds that would cut their benefits.

He emphasized that there’s no agreed lawful method for calculating payouts and called for clarity on the use of an ‘erosion’ mechanism.

Scale of the Compensation Effort

  • Total Cost: £452 million has been set aside for backdated payments.
  • Number of Claimants: Roughly 57,000 individuals are affected.
  • Per-Person Compensation: Estimated at £5,000+ each, with some settlements already reaching up to £6,000 or more.
  • Monthly Shortfall: Many claimants suffered losses up to £180 per month prior to 2019.
  • Complex Cases: Around 13,000 complicated cases remain unresolved and are expected to be addressed by September 2025.

Monthly Payment Breakdown

Compensation is structured based on monthly rates tied to the specific benefits lost, calculated for each month from the claimant’s move to Universal Credit up until the introduction of income protection rules in February 2024.

  • Enhanced Disability Premium (single): £84
  • Enhanced Disability Premium (couple): £120
  • Disability Premium (single): £172
  • Disability Premium (couple): £246
  • Disabled child (per eligible child): £177

Summary Table

CategoryDetails / Figures
Total Compensation Fund£452 million
Affected Claimants57,000 individuals
Estimated Payout per Person£5,000+, up to £6,000
Monthly Loss Pre-2019Up to £180 per month
Complex Cases Pending13,000, to be resolved by September 2025
Monthly Rate – Enhanced SDP (Single)£84
Monthly Rate – Enhanced SDP (Couple)£120
Monthly Rate – Disability Premium (Single)£172
Monthly Rate – Disability Premium (Couple)£246
Monthly Rate – Disabled Child (each)£177

The DWP’s £452 million compensation scheme addresses a serious injustice inflicted on thousands of vulnerable individuals.

However, the lack of transparent calculations, questionable use of benefit-cutting thresholds, and unresolved complex cases—nearly 13,000—have prompted strong criticism from legal advocates.

For the compensation to be truly fair and credible, the DWP must publish a clear, lawful calculation method and ensure that disabled claimants aren’t penalized for receiving what they’re rightfully owed.

FAQs

Who is eligible for this compensation?

Eligibility includes individuals moved from legacy income-based benefits—like ESA—that included Enhanced Disability Premium, Disability Premium, or Disabled Child Premium before transitioning to Universal Credit where SDP should have applied.

How long will it take to resolve all claims?

Most payouts have been issued, but around 13,000 complex cases remain and are expected to be resolved by September 2025.

Why are lawyers calling for transparency?

Lawyers argue there’s no clear, lawful method for calculating payouts, and some claimants have been unfairly warned that compensation could reduce other benefits—an outcome they say is scandalous and unjust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version